-
07/2012 - GREEN/BOD AND HQ MEMBERSHIP REQUIREMENTS EFFECTIVE JULY 27 2012
The following are new rules for advancement to upper levels on ISOC. Upper levels are for posting certain private information and pictures for an audience that will not snitch to chicas information in these levels. It is for trusted mongers. No level is 100% safe as has been proven over time. The process for advancement is based on board performance and meeting various members. It is the goal of the current members to vote based on merit and is not a popularity contest.
These rules have been voted on and approved by the business members and will be the RULE going forward July 2012. Any poll not set up correctly will be deleted by Mods. Any candidate nomination not meeting below criteria will be deleted by Mods. PM Mod if you are not sure or have questions on your candidate’s eligibility.
All current members are grandfathered in and will not need a new poll.
Remember the groups are color coded. The Business members are Red/Orange.
Administrators | Super Moderators | Headquarters | BOD | Green
GREEN LEVEL
1. You must have at least 250 posts.
2. You must have two trip reports with chica pictures of your conquests. We do not need a certain number of chica pictures from the report or them spread eagle naked. We realize chica pictures are getting harder to get as time goes by. Most will take them with their clothes on which is fine. For great examples of trip reports with pictures see any of Tigers reports in The Tiger Den. Jimbos reports are other great examples. You must be a paying member to view Tigers or Jimbos reports.
3. You can be nominated by anyone in BOD, HQ, or Business groups.
4. Voting will be done in BOD. Format of poll is public poll. Yes – No – Sitting this out. To be approved for green you must get 65% of the yes-no votes plus a mininum of 12 Yes votes. Sitting this out votes do not count towards winning/losing percentage. Polls run for 7 days.
5. Candidates who lose a vote may be renominated in 6 months.
BOD LEVEL (Board of Directors)
1. You must have at least 1000 posts. For candidates that business members feel are BOD worthy but do not have enough posts the following is allowed: A business member can vouch for candidate and this adds 250 posts to the candidates post total. Maximum of two vouches for 500 posts.
2. You have be Green for a total duration of one year. For candidates that business members feel are BOD worthy and should be fast tracked the following is allowed: A business member can vouch for candidate and this adds 3 months to candidates green duration. Maximum of two vouches for 6 months added to candidates green duration.
3. You must meet in person and hang out for an evening or afternoon either of the following combination of members. You can meet one at a time or all at once.
a. One Business Member
or
b. Two HQ or Business Members
or
c. Three BOD, HQ or Business Members
This meeting is very informal. We are here to have fun and not interrogate you. Be yourself.
4. You can be nominated by anyone in BOD, HQ, or Business groups.
5. Voting will be done in BOD. Format of poll is public poll. Yes – No – Sitting this out. To be approved for BOD you must get 65% of the yes-no votes plus a minimum of 12 Yes votes. Sitting this out votes do not count towards winning/losing percentage. Polls run for 7 days.
6. Candidates who lose votes may be renominated in 6 months.
HQ LEVEL (Headquarters)
1. Private vote conducted by business members only.
-
GREEN/BOD AND HQ MEMBERSHIP REQUIREMENTS EFFECTIVE JULY 27 2012
the rules going forward for setting up a poll to nominate someone for advancement has been outlined above.
please note;
do NOT put the members name in the poll or thread as ANYONE can see/read the thread title IF its the newest thread in that section.
also try to ensure they meet the minimum requirements before starting the poll
thanks to Hunter for taking the time to sift thru everyones comments and suggestions and arive at the new and improved requirements:iconTU:
-
Re: GREEN/BOD AND HQ MEMBERSHIP REQUIREMENTS EFFECTIVE JULY 27 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by
whynotme
TEST...........
might be better if it originated from a mod....so you get the arrows,,,but looks good :lol:
-
Re: GREEN/BOD AND HQ MEMBERSHIP REQUIREMENTS EFFECTIVE JULY 27 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Hunter
might be better if it originated from a mod....so you get the arrows,,,but looks good :lol:
i am computer illiterate........too late:rofl:
i closed and unstickyed the original 2006 requirements so if need be we can always refer back to our roots and then
i opened this thread with a test post and then copied and pasted the final draft BUT it bumped my post to second as yours was posted before mine, so i guess we can share the arrows:rofl:
-
Re: GREEN/BOD AND HQ MEMBERSHIP REQUIREMENTS EFFECTIVE JULY 27 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by
whynotme
i am computer illiterate........too late:rofl:
i closed and unstickyed the original 2006 requirements so if need be we can always refer back to our roots and then
i opened this thread with a test post and then copied and pasted the final draft BUT it bumped my post to second as yours was posted before mine, so i guess we can share the arrows:rofl:
no problem..i can take it...:wink:
-
Re: GREEN/BOD AND HQ MEMBERSHIP REQUIREMENTS EFFECTIVE JULY 27 2012
Thanks for the time and effort from both of you!!!!:iconTU:
-
Re: GREEN/BOD AND HQ MEMBERSHIP REQUIREMENTS EFFECTIVE JULY 27 2012
Good job guys... it is nice to see the requirements in writing, and the discretionary power of business members allows some leeway with nomination requirements. I need something clarified in the BoD requirements (it is highlighted):
Quote:
1. You must have at least 1000 posts. For candidates that business members feel are BOD worthy but do not have enough posts the following is allowed: A business member can vouch for candidate and this adds 250 posts to the candidates post total. Maximum of two vouches for 500 posts.
2. You have be Green for a total duration of one year. For candidates that business members feel are BOD worthy and should be fast tracked the following is allowed: A business member can vouch for candidate and this adds 3 months to candidates green duration. Maximum of two vouches for 6 months added to candidates green duration.
3. You must meet in person and hang out for an evening or afternoon either of the following combination of members. You can meet one at a time or all at once.
a. One Business Member
or
b. Two HQ or Business Members
or
c. Three BOD, HQ or Business Members
This meeting is very informal. We are here to have fun and not interrogate you. Be yourself.
4. You can be nominated by anyone in BOD, HQ, or Business groups.
5. Voting will be done in BOD. Format of poll is public poll. Yes – No – Sitting this out. To be approved for BOD you must get 65% of the yes-no votes plus a minimum of 12 Yes votes. Sitting this out votes do not count towards winning/losing percentage. Polls run for 7 days.
6. Candidates who lose votes may be renominated in 6 months.
I understand meeting one business member, but b) and c) are confusing. Do you mean meet at least two (2) HQ members and three (3) BOD members? For instance if me and two other BoD guys would count. But if say, BCell (HQ) and I (BoD) met someone, it would not count because there would need to be another HQ guy present?
I hope I am not making this harder than it is. :rolleyes:
-
Re: GREEN/BOD AND HQ MEMBERSHIP REQUIREMENTS EFFECTIVE JULY 27 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BlueDevil
Good job guys... it is nice to see the requirements in writing, and the discretionary power of business members allows some leeway with nomination requirements. I need something clarified in the BoD requirements (it is highlighted):
I understand meeting one business member, but b) and c) are confusing. Do you mean meet at least two (2) HQ members and three (3) BOD members? For instance if me and two other BoD guys would count. But if say, BCell (HQ) and I (BoD) met someone, it would not count because there would need to be another HQ guy present?
I hope I am not making this harder than it is. :rolleyes:
Technically yes...that would not count. But in reality that would be no problem.
The old rules had the HQ or Business member meeting mandatory which is unrealistic now because of HQ and Business members going to different countries.
So we said 3 BOD members or higher which most candidates meet.
-
Re: GREEN/BOD AND HQ MEMBERSHIP REQUIREMENTS EFFECTIVE JULY 27 2012
Much appreciated Hunter and all involved in bringing clarity to the subject.
New as I am to this level, I did some searching to understand it better and left reading the "older" threads more confused.
Muchos gracias.
-
Re: GREEN/BOD AND HQ MEMBERSHIP REQUIREMENTS EFFECTIVE JULY 27 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by
whynotme
i am computer illiterate........too late:rofl:
i closed and unstickyed the original 2006 requirements so if need be we can always refer back to our roots and then
i opened this thread with a test post and then copied and pasted the final draft BUT it bumped my post to second as yours was posted before mine, so i guess we can share the arrows:rofl:
I'm guessing that "sharing the arrows" is something that only happens in the business world?
Obviously a lot of thought went into throwing this together. Hopefully the members will take the time to read and understand them.
Muchas gracias, compadres.
-
Re: GREEN/BOD AND HQ MEMBERSHIP REQUIREMENTS EFFECTIVE JULY 27 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by
MrHappy
I'm guessing that "sharing the arrows" is something that only happens in the business world?
Obviously a lot of thought went into throwing this together. Hopefully the members will take the time to read and understand them.
Muchas gracias, compadres.
the best policies/settlements is when both sides come out feeling they didnt get what they wanted:corky:
you cant make everyone happy, but everyone tried to make it easy and with a k.i.s.s. policy:iconTU:
-
Re: GREEN/BOD AND HQ MEMBERSHIP REQUIREMENTS EFFECTIVE JULY 27 2012
boy-oh-boy
for a bunch of knuckleheaded whore mongers there sure are a lot of rules . . . :rofl: :mrgreen: :rofl:
-
Re: GREEN/BOD AND HQ MEMBERSHIP REQUIREMENTS EFFECTIVE JULY 27 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by
the_Jayman
boy-oh-boy
for a bunch of knuckleheaded whore mongers there sure are a lot of rules . . . :rofl: :mrgreen: :rofl:
Ah, FUCK YOU!!!!! :mrgreen:
-
Re: GREEN/BOD AND HQ MEMBERSHIP REQUIREMENTS EFFECTIVE JULY 27 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by
PapiQueRico
Ah, FUCK YOU!!!!! :mrgreen:
Thank You ! ! ! :mrgreen:
-
Re: GREEN/BOD AND HQ MEMBERSHIP REQUIREMENTS EFFECTIVE JULY 27 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by
the_Jayman
boy-oh-boyfor a bunch of knuckleheaded whore mongers there sure are a lot of rules :rofl: :mrgreen: :rofl:
Quote:
Originally Posted by
PapiQueRico
Ah, FUCK YOU!!!!! :mrgreen:
Quote:
Originally Posted by
the_Jayman
Thank You ! ! ! :mrgreen:
:rofl::rofl:
and that was using the kiss principle:corky:
Keep It Simple Stupid:rofl:
-
Re: GREEN/BOD AND HQ MEMBERSHIP REQUIREMENTS EFFECTIVE JULY 27 2012
Great info.. I have NO idea where I fit in but good to know
-
Re: GREEN/BOD AND HQ MEMBERSHIP REQUIREMENTS EFFECTIVE JULY 27 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by
vpchill
Great info.. I have NO idea where I fit in but good to know
I just hope I skip the 'Post Whore' label. I'd feel so cheap and dirty--well, I am in many ways, but still.
VP, Mr. Smooth, Toro should be Green soon
-
Re: GREEN/BOD AND HQ MEMBERSHIP REQUIREMENTS EFFECTIVE JULY 27 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by
the_Jayman
boy-oh-boy
for a bunch of knuckleheaded whore mongers there sure are a lot of rules . . . :rofl: :mrgreen: :rofl:
Who woke you up?
When's your next trip, Slim?
-
Re: discussion on new rules going forward
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Hunter
BOD LEVEL (Board of Directors)
2. You have be Green for a total duration of one year. For candidates that business members feel are BOD worthy and should be fast tracked the following is allowed: A business member can vouch for candidate and this adds 3 months to candidates green duration. Maximum of two vouches for 6 months added to candidates green duration.
.
Can you please define "total duration" ?
I held green for a year prior then downgraded, then Green again so is "total duration" include total time spent green since a member or concurrent?
Im just curious all other criteria has been met as fas has meeting business, HQ and Bod members Several Times :rofl:
-
Re: discussion on new rules going forward
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Skynyrd
Can you please define "total duration" ?
I held green for a year prior then downgraded, then Green again so is "total duration" include total time spent green since a member or concurrent?
Im just curious all other criteria has been met as fas has meeting business, HQ and Bod members Several Times :rofl:
I think its based on the green date next to your name
I'm curious how one becomees a supermod
-
Re: discussion on new rules going forward
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Dominican dave
I think its based on the green date next to
thats the question since it says total duration and not consecutive:mrgreen:
and stop trying to cockblock me Dave, I'm trying to slip in a loophole!:rofl::rofl::rofl:
-
Re: discussion on new rules going forward
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Dominican dave
I think its based on the green date next to your name
I'm curious how one becomees a supermod
I wouldn't worry about it. The pay sucks!!!!! :)
-
Re: discussion on new rules going forward
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Skynyrd
Can you please define "total duration" ?
I held green for a year prior then downgraded, then Green again so is "total duration" include total time spent green since a member or concurrent?
Im just curious all other criteria has been met as fas has meeting business, HQ and Bod members Several Times :rofl:
Yours is a special case. I think you qualify and wouldnt be a problem if someone nominated you for BOD. I am only thinking out loud because Jimmy is the boss. He can rule.
-
Re: discussion on new rules going forward
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Hunter
Yours is a special case. I think you qualify and wouldnt be a problem if someone nominated you for BOD. I am only thinking out loud because Jimmy is the boss. He can rule.
He came back strong. we have rules for this now.
-
Re: discussion on new rules going forward
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Skynyrd
thats the question since it says total duration and not consecutive:mrgreen:
and stop trying to cockblock me Dave, I'm trying to slip in a loophole!:rofl::rofl::rofl:
We don't like voting for guys that are too eager to get in.
-
Re: discussion on new rules going forward
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Dominican dave
I'm curious how one becomees a supermod
When the current ones die off, DT will make new ones.
-
Re: discussion on new rules going forward
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Señor JDR of Medellin
He came back strong. we have rules for this now.
Thanks Boss:mrgreen:
-
Re: discussion on new rules going forward
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Señor JDR of Medellin
When the current ones die off, DT will make new ones.
There goes my chance!!!
I'm bound to die before these youngsters!!!!:rofl::rofl::rofl:
-
Re: discussion on new rules going forward
Quote:
Originally Posted by
jacknback
There goes my chance!!!
I'm bound to die before these youngsters!!!!:rofl::rofl::rofl:
Do you really want it at 90 years of age?
-
Re: discussion on new rules going forward
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Dominican dave
I'm curious how one becomees a supermod
We could tell you but then we would have to kill you . . . oh and I only look like a supermod . . . I'd be dangerous if I knew what I was doin :rofl: