View Poll Results: Shorten the limit?

Voters
21. You may not vote on this poll
  • No, 10 is fine and we have the "Fuck You" feature already

    10 47.62%
  • 8, so Jayman can say "Fuck You"

    2 9.52%
  • 5, cut it in half

    1 4.76%
  • 4 or lower so I can say "nice"

    8 38.10%
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 31 of 31

Thread: Should we shorten the message limit?

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    MICHIGAN
    Age
    53
    Posts
    4,197
    Thanks
    4,757
    Thanked 3,215 Times in 1,303 Posts

    Re: Should we shorten the message limit?

    Quote Originally Posted by Manigault
    You talking about my Sixers when they Swept the Lakers in '83 to win the Title.

    Fo, fo, and fo stood for the 3 series that the Sixers swept through the playoffs. Although they did lose one game.
    Well.........Your sixers have sucked ever since!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    Chicas....."Don't walk around like yo shit don't stink cause I'm DEPUTY DAWG I'll put yo booty in the KLINK!!!!!!"

    GO STEELERS!!!!!!!!!!!

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Somewhere in the Swamps of Jersey
    Age
    60
    Posts
    16,623
    Thanks
    8,624
    Thanked 13,105 Times in 4,296 Posts

    Re: Should we shorten the message limit?

    Quote Originally Posted by Manigault
    Whats the point of the limit at all?
    the default setting was 10 and DT hasn't been paid enough to bother trying to figure out how to change it but he just happened to bump into the answer while drinkin rum last night and created this poll . . .
    Who me ? ? ?
    nahhhh . . . move along, move along . . .

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Age
    52
    Posts
    10,468
    Thanks
    14,099
    Thanked 19,385 Times in 4,164 Posts

    Re: Should we shorten the message limit?

    Quote Originally Posted by DEPUTY DAWG
    Or six for you sox fans.......
    Six repeats? Yeah that sounds good, we can give everyone else a chance in 2011.
    Try our new ISOC Features!
    • Create a Countdown Timer for your upcoming trip or a special date here.
    • Print out one of our Money Cheat Sheets so you know much shit costs! here
    • Create Albums for your Pictures here.
    • Join Social Groups to view other's Albums here.
    • Browse our concise & informative Wiki here.
    • Learn Spanish, Check Exchange Rates, or The Weather.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    New Jersey
    Age
    54
    Posts
    6,158
    Thanks
    65
    Thanked 679 Times in 350 Posts

    Re: Should we shorten the message limit?

    Quote Originally Posted by DEPUTY DAWG
    Well.........Your sixers have sucked ever since!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    You aint lying! But we'll also get to see how tough sheed is without Wallace backing him up this year too.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Atlanta
    Age
    55
    Posts
    24,018
    Thanks
    55,072
    Thanked 33,954 Times in 10,160 Posts

    Re: Should we shorten the message limit?

    Quote Originally Posted by Manigault
    You talking about my Sixers when they Swept the Lakers in '83 to win the Title.

    Fo, fo, and fo stood for the 3 series that the Sixers swept through the playoffs. Although they did lose one game.
    Well done, young man!!! You even spelled it right (fo, fo, fo) . That was Moses' prediction of how the Sixers would do in the playoffs!

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Atlanta
    Age
    55
    Posts
    24,018
    Thanks
    55,072
    Thanked 33,954 Times in 10,160 Posts

    Re: Should we shorten the message limit?

    Quote Originally Posted by whynotme
    too late Apos ( i think)
    four
    in 21 seasons he was # 4th on the all time list
    Do i get my cookie
    lol
    Nope. Good job of thinking and researching. I'll see if I can find a consolation prize. Wait, I have a lollipop left over that I didn't give out. It's all yours, whynot!!

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    MICHIGAN
    Age
    53
    Posts
    4,197
    Thanks
    4,757
    Thanked 3,215 Times in 1,303 Posts

    Re: Should we shorten the message limit?

    Quote Originally Posted by Manigault
    You aint lying! But we'll also get to see how tough sheed is without Wallace backing him up this year too.
    Fuck sheed because of him we lost to the spurs in '05 we should've closed them out in six games!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Oh Yeah D.T. You suck!!!!!!!!!!!

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Santo Domingo
    Age
    72
    Posts
    15,865
    Blog Entries
    1
    Thanks
    300,624
    Thanked 84,377 Times in 13,906 Posts

    Re: Should we shorten the message limit?

    I say leave it as it is.. There's waaay too many short messages now as it is.....
    If you think it's love try not paying in the morning..

    "Do not regret growing older. It is a privilege denied to many."

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    New Jersey
    Age
    54
    Posts
    6,158
    Thanks
    65
    Thanked 679 Times in 350 Posts

    Re: Should we shorten the message limit?

    Quote Originally Posted by DEPUTY DAWG
    Fuck sheed because of him we lost to the spurs in '05 we should've closed them out in six games!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Oh Yeah D.T. You suck!!!!!!!!!!!
    Im not sure if yall can beat the Bulls this year lol. Does Mcdyess have anything left?

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    New Jersey
    Age
    54
    Posts
    6,158
    Thanks
    65
    Thanked 679 Times in 350 Posts

    Re: Should we shorten the message limit?

    Quote Originally Posted by MrHappy
    I say leave it as it is.. There's waaay too many short messages now as it is.....
    Now that you put it this way perhaps it is good to leave it.

  11. #31
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    6,706
    Blog Entries
    1
    Thanks
    20,195
    Thanked 25,607 Times in 5,261 Posts

    Re: Should we shorten the message limit?

    I think there should be no lower limit to posts’ length, after all if someone wants to post a short answer they will post a short answer – whether that short answer has 2, 5 or 10 characters makes no difference at all.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •