Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: 3rd Party Image Hosting feature

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Age
    52
    Posts
    10,468
    Thanks
    14,099
    Thanked 19,385 Times in 4,164 Posts

    Warning 3rd Party Image Hosting feature

    I have developed an interface for third party image hosting with a site that accepts hardcore adult pics!

    Just click on the button and follow the directions in the popup window. Then after hitting "Upload" you will be directed to the hoster's site and provided the [IMG] tags. Please note they do reduce the overall resolution size of uploaded pics by 75%, but no reduction in quality!

    PS. ISOC in NO WAY guarantees the pictures you may upload to this site!
    Try our new ISOC Features!
    • Create a Countdown Timer for your upcoming trip or a special date here.
    • Print out one of our Money Cheat Sheets so you know much shit costs! here
    • Create Albums for your Pictures here.
    • Join Social Groups to view other's Albums here.
    • Browse our concise & informative Wiki here.
    • Learn Spanish, Check Exchange Rates, or The Weather.

  2. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Don Tomas For This Useful Post:


  3. # ADS
    Our Supporters Support our advertisers!
    Join Date
    Always
    Age
    2010
    Posts
    Many
     
  4. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Canada
    Age
    72
    Posts
    7,530
    Thanks
    17,288
    Thanked 14,718 Times in 3,229 Posts

    Re: 3rd Party Image Hosting feature

    Went to give you "thanks" for the above post and I get this.... but the "thanks" still works

    LM, you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
    1. Your user account may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
    2. If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
    C.I.S.O.C.
    Cuba.....Cigars and beautiful chicas

    One life I'm gonna live it up....Judas Priest, You Got Another Thing Coming

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to LM For This Useful Post:


  6. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Age
    52
    Posts
    10,468
    Thanks
    14,099
    Thanked 19,385 Times in 4,164 Posts

    Re: 3rd Party Image Hosting feature

    Quote Originally Posted by LM View Post
    Went to give you "thanks" for the above post and I get this.... but the "thanks" still works

    LM, you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
    1. Your user account may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
    2. If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
    Odd your thanks showed up, did you copy the URL by chance?

  7. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Canada
    Age
    72
    Posts
    7,530
    Thanks
    17,288
    Thanked 14,718 Times in 3,229 Posts

    Re: 3rd Party Image Hosting feature

    No..I didn't...but I removed my thanks and redid it and all is OK...Oh Well

  8. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    6,706
    Blog Entries
    1
    Thanks
    20,195
    Thanked 25,606 Times in 5,261 Posts

    Re: 3rd Party Image Hosting feature

    Thanks DT for the link!

    OK, let’s see the difference.

    With ISOC:



    With the new third-party one:


  9. The Following User Says Thank You to Gladiator For This Useful Post:


  10. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Age
    52
    Posts
    10,468
    Thanks
    14,099
    Thanked 19,385 Times in 4,164 Posts

    Re: 3rd Party Image Hosting feature

    Thanks Gladiator,

    I am on the laptop right now and can't see a difference will look tonight on my new monitor!

  11. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    En mi miente
    Posts
    13,300
    Thanks
    14,817
    Thanked 16,456 Times in 3,763 Posts

    Re: 3rd Party Image Hosting feature

    Oh of course there is no difference if you are using a Fred Flinstone camera.

    But if you have a High Def 7 megapixel image you will notice the difference.

    Hey I was just making a suggestion, please continue to post pictures using the ISOC hosting solution.

    Who am I to gainsay any alleged difference in picture quality.

    Just a thought look at any of ErikS' threads and compare and contrast the pictures that he posts using Photobucket and the ones using ISOC and tell me that there is no difference.

  12. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Age
    52
    Posts
    10,468
    Thanks
    14,099
    Thanked 19,385 Times in 4,164 Posts

    Re: 3rd Party Image Hosting feature

    Quote Originally Posted by WSJ3 View Post
    Just a thought look at any of ErikS' threads and compare and contrast the pictures that he posts using Photobucket and the ones using ISOC and tell me that there is no difference.
    Ok here's an ErikS' pic:

    Photobucket


    vbImagehost


    Again on this laptop I can't see any difference. But the original pic is only 77kb, definitely something not from a 7 megapixel camera or if it was it's been coverted already.

  13. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Don Tomas For This Useful Post:


  14. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Canada
    Age
    72
    Posts
    7,530
    Thanks
    17,288
    Thanked 14,718 Times in 3,229 Posts

    Re: 3rd Party Image Hosting feature

    I definitely find a difference with Image Shack and the Image Host here...and I upload pics that are at 1024x768....

    Sometimes it significant...to my eyes anyway

  15. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to LM For This Useful Post:


  16. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    6,706
    Blog Entries
    1
    Thanks
    20,195
    Thanked 25,606 Times in 5,261 Posts

    Re: 3rd Party Image Hosting feature

    The pic of the Thai spinner I posted below was taken with an Olympus FE-120, 6.0 megapixels - it's not professional equipment but isn't Flintstones' standard either

    I obviously do see a difference when I compare my original with the below 2 compresed by the server, but from what I can see the difference between those 2 compresed pics below is minimal.

  17. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    En mi miente
    Posts
    13,300
    Thanks
    14,817
    Thanked 16,456 Times in 3,763 Posts

    Re: 3rd Party Image Hosting feature

    Quote Originally Posted by LM View Post
    I definitely find a difference with Image Shack and the Image Host here...and I upload pics that are at 1024x768....

    Sometimes it significant...to my eyes anyway
    That was exactly the point that I was trying to make.

    If the site is going to strive for excellence in other areas why not do the same for the images.

    Granted the server has space issues but there are other image hosting solutions available that are far better than the ISOC hosting solution.

  18. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to WSJ3 For This Useful Post:

    LM

  19. #12
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Age
    52
    Posts
    10,468
    Thanks
    14,099
    Thanked 19,385 Times in 4,164 Posts

    Re: 3rd Party Image Hosting feature

    Quote Originally Posted by LM View Post
    I definitely find a difference with Image Shack and the Image Host here...and I upload pics that are at 1024x768....

    Sometimes it significant...to my eyes anyway
    Try the new 3rd party hoster and let me know then, hence the point of this post.

    Quote Originally Posted by WSJ3 View Post
    That was exactly the point that I was trying to make.

    If the site is going to strive for excellence in other areas why not do the same for the images.

    Granted the server has space issues but there are other image hosting solutions available that are far better than the ISOC hosting solution.
    Your words "far better" might be a stretch considering Gladiator's 6.0mp example. But again you requested an alternative for our users and again that is what this post is about; an alternative site that excepts even hardcore pics with a simple to use interface.

  20. The Following User Says Thank You to Don Tomas For This Useful Post:

    LM

  21. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Age
    60
    Posts
    19,564
    Thanks
    5,727
    Thanked 50,505 Times in 13,124 Posts

    Re: 3rd Party Image Hosting feature

    Quote Originally Posted by WSJ3 View Post
    Oh of course there is no difference if you are using a Fred Flinstone camera.

    But if you have a High Def 7 megapixel image you will notice the difference.

    Hey I was just making a suggestion, please continue to post pictures using the ISOC hosting solution.

    Who am I to gainsay any alleged difference in picture quality.

    Just a thought look at any of ErikS' threads and compare and contrast the pictures that he posts using Photobucket and the ones using ISOC and tell me that there is no difference.
    Quote Originally Posted by Don Tomas View Post
    Ok here's an ErikS' pic:

    Photobucket


    vbImagehost


    Again on this laptop I can't see any difference. But the original pic is only 77kb, definitely something not from a 7 megapixel camera or if it was it's been coverted already.
    Look at the picture in post 188 of this thread
    http://news.insearchofchicas.org/for...ad.php?t=55822

    THis is the example of the quality loss. The faces get all wrinkled. There are other pictures in this thread in Photobucket that do not have that distortion. I think this is the point WSJ3 is making.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •